Archive for NBA Playoffs

Why the Hawks have to win tonight

Posted in Mike's Take with tags , , , , on April 25, 2009 by Michael Y

It is simple. If the Hawks want to win this series or at least win this series without having their backs against the wall, they have to win tonight. I didn’t realize that they Hawks haven’t won a road playoff game since 1997. They are currently 0-11. That stat is interesting, but that isn’t the stat that bothers me. If you recall last year, when Atlanta fans were happy that they won 3 games against the mighty Celtics, that all of those games were at home. If you also recall last year, the winning margins for the Celtics in Boston against the Hawks were by 23, 19, 25 and 34 points. To me, that is the cause of concern. It doesn’t matter that the Hawks haven’t won 11 straight road playoff games, it matters that this current Hawks team hasn’t won a road playoff game. Half the team wasn’t even 13 years old yet when that streak started, but they were all there when they choked, and choked hard, in Boston. Granted, the Heat are not anywhere near as talented as the Celtics were, but this game is so important because (a) it will break the Heat’s spirit a little bit (b) not put the Hawks down 2-1 with the chance to come back to Atlanta with their backs against a 3-1 deficit.

I am not completely sure why there was such a difference from game 1 to game 2, but from what I saw, it seemed the Hawks became complacent. The first game they played good team defense and stopped DWade from beating them. I guess they didn’t get the memo that you have to keep playing like that because he isn’t going to give up…ever. You have to play team defense, and on offense you have to attack the basket. Don’t settle for jumpers, take it down low. You want this game to be a defensive game. The Heat can and will beat the Hawks if the Hawks try and outscore the Heat and not play defense. The Hawks beat the Heat three times out of the four that they played this year. The Hawks didn’t score over 91 points in any of those games. I know defense isn’t pretty, but good defense wins games in the NBA Playoffs.

Mike’s Picks: NBA Playoffs 2009

Posted in Mike's Take with tags , , on April 16, 2009 by Michael Y

So the NBA regular season is over. Let the playoffs begin! I am not going to claim that I am the magical guru and that you can take my picks to Vegas and get rich (which I do not endorse gambling at all), but here is how my little mind sees the playoffs shaking out.

Let’s start with the West, shall we?

WESTERN CONFERENCE

(1) Los Angeles Lakers vs. (8) Utah Jazz
Jazz may give the Lakers problems, but Lakers in 6.

(2) Denver Nuggets vs. (7) New Orleans Hornets
Nuggets should be able to slow down Chris Paul, Nuggets in 5.

(3) San Antonio Spurs vs. (6) Dallas Mavericks
Parker gets the Spurs out of the first round, Spurs in 7.

(4) Portland Trailblazers vs. (5) Houston Rockets
Blazers are 9-1 in last 10; another 1st round Rockets choke, Blazers in 7.

—–

(1) LA Lakers vs. (4) Portland Trailblazers
I will call an upset…Blazers in 7.

(2) Denver Nuggets vs. (3) San Antonio Spurs
Nuggets are just better, Nuggets in 5.

—–

(2) Denver Nuggets vs. (4) Portland Trailblazers
Didn’t intend on having these 2 teams in the Western Conference finals, but Blazers in 6.

.

EASTERN CONFERENCE

(1) Cleveland Cavaliers vs. (8) Detroit Pistons
These games might look like the Michigan St/UNC game, Cavs in 5.

(2) Boston Celtics vs. (7) Chicago Bulls
Just look at the PG, Rondo > Rose, Celtics in 5.

(3) Orlando Magic vs. (6) Philadelphia 76ers
Continuation of the Eastern Conference 1st round snooze-fest, Magic in 4.

(4) Atlanta Hawks vs. (5) Miami Heat
You ever feel that knot in your stomach right before throw up…I hope that isn’t the case for the Atlanta Hawks. Atlanta stops D-Wade on the road, Hawks in 6. [though it wouldn't surprise me if the Hawks somehow lost]

—–

(1) Cleveland Cavaliers vs. (4) Atlanta Hawks
Would love to see the Hawks show up and play well like they did against the Celtics last year, but I just don’t see it happening, Cavs in 6.

(2) Boston Celtics vs. (3) Orlando Magic
Interesting series, will KG play? We’ll have to see, Magic in 7.

—–

(1) Cleveland Cavaliers vs. (3) Orlando Magic
Magic won’t be able to stop Lebron, Cavs in 6.

.

NBA CHAMPIONSHIP
(1) Cleveland Cavaliers vs. (4) Portland Trailblazers
Last year spoiled us. Remember 2 years ago? I was working the board at ESPN Radio in Memphis and we were watching The Departed rather than paying any attention to the Spurs waxing the Cavs. Same thing this year except reversed, Cleveland in 5. (no matter if it is Portland or not)

Marvin’s back; Preview of playoffs on Tuesday

Posted in Mike's Take with tags , , , , , on April 10, 2009 by Michael Y

The Hawks weren’t going to back into the playoffs by waiting on Miami to lose. They went and took the fourth seed themselves. After dropping games to Philly, Boston, and Orlando, the Hawks bounced back this week to win three games (two on the road for all of you “Hawks cant win on the road” hater). Tonight they beat the Pacers, and got back Marvin Williams after a 16-game absence. It is good that the Hawks don’t have to worry about their seeding the last two games and can somewhat rest and get ready for the playoffs. Marvin Wiliams.JPGGetting Marvin back tonight was huge for two reasons: (1) he can get a few games in under his belt to shake the rust off before it matters. The Hawks have impressed me with their performance while he has been out. They went 10-6 without him, with only one of those losses to a team that had a worse record than the Hawks. One person that has really stepped up is Josh Smith. He has been going to the basket and in addition to scoring, he has gone to the free throw line 47 times the last 5 games, while going to the free throw line 85 times for the whole month of March. He is attacking the basket, and in the process, opening up the offense for the Hawks. (2) he can get that chemistry back with his teammates. The Hawks have to play good defense if they are going to advance in the playoffs, and with the liklihood that they will be facing D-Wade in the first round, they are going to have to be able to have good team defense. Speaking of the Heat, guess who comes to town on Tuesday for the final home game of the regular season…the Miami Heat. I don’t like it when teams play and then turn around and play each other again in the first round of the playoffs, but sometimes the schedule works out that way. If I were Woodson, I would rest my starters more than usual in not only the game on Tuesday, but in the regualr season finale at Memphis on Wednesday as well. I don’t think momentum is as important in the NBA as it is in some of the other leagues, like MLB. Last year the Hawks didn’t have an impressive last few weeks, but they turned it on against the Celtics in the first round. I think now that they have the 4th seed locked up, they need to be getting ready for that series. Use the game on Tuesday to have the starters sitting on the bench talking about what they see the Heat doing on the floor, almost like a live video study. I don’t know what Woodson is going to do, but if he can motivate those players to play come playoff time so that the Hawks win a series and make the next one competitive, then I think Woodson has every right to keep being the coach of the team and it should shut up those that say he isn’t good enough.

Looking at the Hawks win objectively

Posted in Game Commentary with tags , , , on March 30, 2009 by Michael Y

Take that Hawks message board haters, the Atlanta Hawks dominated the LA Lakers yesterday afternoon. I don’t get to watch many of the Hawk’s games, but I was able to Sunday, and let me tell you, the Hawks really did dominate that game. BUT, as much as I would like to say that the Hawks are for real and that they are going to win in the playoffs, I put my “objectivity” hat on and look at the actual facts.

Fact #1: The game was at home. The Hawks are much better at home than on the road. The win would have been much more quality had they beat the Lakers on the road, because that is what the Hawks are going to have to do in the playoffs in order to advance.

Fact #2: The Lakers lost the game more than the Hawks won the game. Let’s examine the evidence. (a) Kobe Bryant had only 17 points. You know he can score more. (b) This was the Lakers fifth straight game on the road. They have been on the road for more than a week, they are tired. If you watched this game, you could tell that this wasn’t a good Laker performance. (c) The Lakers shot 35% from the floor and 20% from the 3pt line. You aren’t going to win many games shooting that poor from the floor.

Fact #3: The Hawks had every shot falling, and then some. Here is Mike Bibby’s ridiculous three pointer off the top of the backboard. [see below]

Yeah, it was a great victory for the Hawks, but let’s not get too carried away with it.

March Madness? Hawks sweep home stand

Posted in Mike's Take with tags , , , , , , on March 20, 2009 by Michael Y

In basketball, it is thought that crazy things happen in March. Though it may not be complete madness that with the defeat of the Mavericks last night, the Atlanta Hawks swept their seven-game home stand, it is at least a great step forward as the Hawks prepare for the playoffs, which begin in less than a month. Here are four things to glean from the superb performance by the hometown boys:

1. They can play without Marvin Williams.
When Marvin went down in the Pistons’ game and then Joe Johnson’s comments about Marvin being hurt put a real scare into me. I mean, Marvin has averaged 14 points and 6 rebounds this season and our front-court depth is not really something to brag about, but so far, it looks like the Hawks are “making do” and even though there is no word that he may return anytime soon, the Hawks have gotten by surprisingly well.

2. They can play up to the caliber of their competition.
During the seven-game home stand, the Hawks played 5 of the 7 games against teams that have winning records and are currently in the playoffs in their respective conference. It was good to see them play well against the good teams, but they will have to keep it up, seeing that seven of their next 8 games are also against current playoff teams, including a huge game on Saturday in Cleveland against the Cavaliers, who are 31-1 at home this season.

3. They have a proper mindset.
I think there are two things that fall under this. The first is the fact that the Hawks realize how valuable these home games are and they feel like they need to take advantage of the fact that they are in a stretch where 11 out of 12 games are at home. If they would have gone 5-2 or 6-1, it would not have been that big of a deal, but I like the fact that they took advantage of playing at home and were able to find a way to win each game. The second thing is the mindset of playing the “lesser teams.” About a month ago, I got extremely frustrated at the Hawks because they became really complacent against the bottom feeders of the NBA, losing to the Knicks, Clippers, Bucks, and Bobcats. I can understand if you lose to a good team, but you can’t afford to play bad and overlook the bad teams because you are more talented than they are. But after the Sacramento game in which the Hawks smashed them 119-97, I loved what Josh Smith said to the media:

“We didn’t want to lose to a team like Sacramento,” Smith said. “No offense to them, but [after] beating New Orleans and Utah, teams who are on top of the Western Conference, we didn’t want to let ourselves down by losing this game. We’re just trying to separate ourselves from the pack. Miami’s right on our heels still.”

4. They have separated themselves a little bit from the Heat.
The last part of his quote leads me into my final gleaning, which is the importance of staying ahead of the Heat and being able to clinch the fourth seed before the last weekend of the season. It seems that is what is important to the Hawks, which it should be. It is so important that the Hawks get home court advantage for the first round so they can continue to become more successful and hopefully get out of the first round of the playoffs.